Pages

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Elections

So what do you think?  Trump or Hillary?  Or will there be no election at all?

The following Wikileaks were received via email from AK, giving credence to the theory held by many that there will be a war instead of an election.

13 comments:

  1. I have always thought there would be no elections. MR

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think there will be no elections. Obama/Hillary will start a war with Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It might also be the case that regardless of the result, Obama ends up instigating a war or false flag event during his lame duck period allowing him to declare martial law and hold on to power, thereby rendering the election of his successor as president to be invalid or something to that effect.

    In the end it is all in the hands of Hashem.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CRITICAL ALERT - USA Goes to DEFCON 3 - NUCLEAR WAR RISK
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRqudOn0kLE

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're all nuts. Those are all conspiracy theories. Go to foxnews.com and any other mainstream site and there is no mention of a war with America. The elections will take place in 3 weeks and a new president will be installed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh Fox News.... now that's a reliable source (sarcasm)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous @ 4.52 - watch this and then tell me what you think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Zcv93nsi7M

    ReplyDelete
  8. ....I wouldn't bury my head in the sand if I were you....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Watched it starting from 4:52......big deal....that video is several months old and that's how putin always talked. You're living in a dream. Obama would be the last person to start a war. His goal is to leave office by January 20 with no wars.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Same old, same old. All men (humankind) must die - eventually. That's the only certainty.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Watch Dov Hikind's take, with which I agree with every word.

    ReplyDelete


  12. Following Wednesday’s presidential debate Pentagon officials found themselves completely dumbfounded as to why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would feel it appropriate to announce U.S. Special Access Program intel on national television.

    According to sources within the Department of Defense speaking under anonymity, Clinton likely violated at least two Dept. of Defense SAP protocols during the debate by announcing on live television the United States Government’s response time for a nuclear launch.

    In case you missed it:

    (Hillary Divulges Nuclear Intelligence from True Pundit on Vimeo. - video in link below)

    “But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton
    To the dismay of intelligence officials, the fact that this top secret information is now publicly known not only proves that Clinton is “unfit to be commander-in-chief,” but it also poses a direct threat to national security.

    One high ranking intelligence official explained that any time frame calculated pertaining to a US nuclear launch “would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches” prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday.

    Via TruePundit

    ReplyDelete

Please choose a name to use on Anonymous posts or your comment may be DELETED. Thank you.