Whale thanks its Rescuers

A whale of a tale: a humpback whale is rescued and says a huge thank you.

Rainbow in Brooklyn

Just before the levaya [funeral] for Leiby a"h yesterday, there was a [hail] storm  in Brooklyn, followed by a double rainbow.  [Photo: Huffington Post]

A sign of judgment, or a sign of Geulah?

Living on the Edge, Literally

Residents of Kingscliff Beach in N.S.W. are watching their backyards falling into the sea.  Whilst erosion has long been a problem there, the ocean's intensity of late has caused the problem to magnify with six metres of parkland being lost in the past week.

Months of sandbagging and shoring up the beach with sand from nearby Cudgen Creek has amounted to nothing as erosion continues to swallow large chunks of land at an ever-increasing rate on Kingscliff beach.

Several tourists at Kingscliff Beach Tweed Coast Holiday Park have been forced to relocate, with the park losing 6m of land in the past week, including 4m on Tuesday night when a mature pandanus tree and Norfolk pine crashed to the beach.

Tweed Shire Council officers are scrambling to shore up what is remaining of the beach ahead of tomorrow's full moon and associated king tides, with further sandbagging expected to take place in front of the caravan park and Cudgen Headland Surf Life Saving Club.

Source: Gold Coast News

Photo Gallery

Audio: Obama in Bible Codes

I haven't listened to this yet: Tamar Yonah interviews Rabbi Matityahu Glazerson on Israel National Radio

What does it say in the Bible about U.S. President Obama and what he will do regarding Israel?  Is he 'The One' to fill the role of Gog in the end times stories about Gog and Magog?  Where does it show in the Bible that indeed this is what it hints to?  Who could Obama be the reincarnation of in the Bible, and where is it written about from the biblical past, about today's Flotilla ships coming to Israel.  it's all in the book called, "Obama in Torah Codes " written by (guest on the show) Rabbi M. Glazerson and Prof. R. Haralick. 

To listen to the interview: click here

Also see: Obama and the Evil at the End of Days or click on the OBAMA label below this post.

A Wake Up Call

When dreadful things happen, I tend to block them out and try to ignore them, because I can't deal with them.

In the case of the little boy HY"D who was found murdered yesterday - murdered by a lunatic who by all accounts should have been locked up long ago - the only way I can deal with it is to get angry at all the frummers who protect these child molesters, who don't go to police and have them locked up, because they don't want to "inform" on another Jew.

Maybe now that the worst possible thing has happened, people will learn.  When you are kind to the cruel, you end up being to cruel to the kind.

Rabbis and communities: stop protecting child abusers, wife beaters and anyone else.  These people are dangerous, maybe you understand that now.  Or tragically, maybe you still don't.

On the Road

Art:Alex Levin

At the end of Pirkei Avot [Ch. 6:9], Rabbi Yossei ben Kisma tells the following story:

I was once walking on the road, when a man greeted me, and I returned his greeting. He said to me "Rabbi, from what place are you?" I told him "From a great city of scholars and teaching scribes am I."

He said to me: "Rabbi would you be willing to live with us in our place? I would then give you a million golden dinar, and precious stones and pearls."

I answered him: "Were you to give me all the silver and gold and precious stones and pearls in the world, I would not live anywhere but in a place of Torah."

And so it is written in the Book of Psalms [ch 119:72] by David King of Israel: "Better to me is the Torah of Thy word, than thousands of gold and silver [pieces]".... It is further stated [Chagai 2:8] "Mine is the silver, and mine the gold, says the Lord."

The Midrash Shmuel suggests that Rabbi Yossei ben Kisma did not notice the man who greeted him. Had he noticed him, he would have greeted him first, as required by the Torah. [Berachot 17a]

Kehati explains that Rabbi Yossei did not accept the offer, mentioning the verse that states that all the riches belong to Hashem. Therefore, Hashem can provide him with his livelihood without having to move to another town.

From the Commentary of the Lubavitcher Rebbe:

The numerous details told in this story will clarify some intriguing points:

1) Why is it relevant to specify that Rabbi Yossei was once walking on the road?

2) The man only inquired as to where Rabbi Yossei was from. Based on his answer, he made an incredible offer. Wouldn't it be more logical to first ask for the Rabbi's name and credentials before deciding to hire him? And how relevant is it to know where he was from?

3) In his answer, Rabbi Yossei says that even if the man would give him all the silver and gold in the world, he would only dwell in a Torah environment. However, the man only offered one million dinar, so why did Rabbi Yossei reply with such exaggeration?

4) When Rabbi Yossei mentions the verse from Tehilim, he cites the author Dovid HaMelech. He does not name the author of any other verse he mentions.

5) Why was it necessary to cite so many verses in support of his decision? How does the last verse, pointing out that all silver and gold belong to Hashem, strengthen his argument?

6) Pirkei Avot is supposed to teach us morals and ethics. What message can be learned from this story with regard to our actions?

Rabbi Yossei ben Kisman's Divine service centered on absolute devotion to the study of Torah. Involvement with any other matter interfered with his studies. That is why he specifies that this story took place when he was once on the road, pointing out that this was an unusual situation, since he was always studying in the Beit Hamedrash.

Nevertheless, even while travelling, Rabbi Yossei was absorbed in reviewing his Torah, and he did not pay any attention to by-passers. For that reason, he did not greet the man first. It was precisely this intense concentration which triggered the interest of this man. This was enough to convince the man that Rabbi Yossei was an uncommon sage. He did not need to know his name nor to ask for any references.

Then the stranger proceeded to ask where Rabbi Yossei was from. By asking this question, the man wanted to know if Rabbi Yossei was indispensable to his town. When Rabbi Yossei answered that he came from a town full of Torah scholars, the man felt that the Rabbi's departure from his home town would not alter its spiritual standing. Therefore, he invited him to serve in his town and promised him a million golden dinar. This offer was made so Rabbi Yossei would be able to devote his attention entirely to the community, with no worries about his own livelihood. This wealth would also enable Rabbi Yossei to give charity generously.

Nevertheless, Rabbi Yossei declined the offer, replying that all the money in the world will not move him from a place of Torah. Rabbi Yossei meant to say that even if he possessed all the money in the world, allowing him to fulfill the mitzvah of tzedakah in the most complete way possible, he would still pass up this privilege in order to stay in a place of Torah. This offer might have been suitable for another rabbi, but Rabbi Yossei's efforts were to be directed only to Torah studies.

Rabbi Yossei then brought support for his approach by mentioning Dovid HaMelech. As a King, he was very wealthy and all his riches were spent for the needs of the monarchy and the needs of the people [Sanhedrin 21a].  Nevertheless, even though he knew the benefits of wealth, King Dovid proclaimed that he preferred the Torah over gold and silver, even when used positively. Why did Rabbi Yossei, as well as King Dovid, favour Torah study over the abundance of deeds (that are facilitated by wealth)?

The main difference between the study of Torah and the performance of its comandments is that in order to be able to perform any mitzvah, some money is needed. The Midrash says [Vayikra Rabbah 27:2] that if one wants to affix a mezuzah on his door post, Hashem has to give him enough money to buy a house, and this applies to every mitzvah. This is the meaning of the verse that Rabbi Yossei mentioned, that all the money belongs to Hashem. Thus, our mitzvot are facilitated by Hashem. The study of Torah, however, does not depend on Hashem [Devarim 30:12] but rather on our own effort. This was Rabbi Yossei's sole interest and to this end did he aspire.

A story is told about a Jew whom the previous Rebbe advised to spend more time studying Torah and less time indulging in worldly matters. The man replied that a Rebbe is detached from the material world and cannot appreciate worldly pleasures. "Should the Rebbe be put to the test and know the great pleasures life has to offer, the Rebbe would not ask me to forfeit them" said the man.

Here we are given advice by Rabbi Yossei ben Kisman, a man who was put to the test, and nonetheless chose to remain in his Torah environment. No money in the world could distract him from his special way of life.

Based on the Sicha of Bamidbar 5734 and Pinchas 5741

"From The Rebbe's Treasure" Vol.2 - by the Students of Seminary Bais Menachem, Montreal Canada - Merkos Publications

Behind the Veil

Art: Sharon Tomlinson

Badeken is the ceremony where the groom veils the bride in a Jewish wedding.


Just prior to the actual wedding ceremony, which takes place under the Chuppah, the bridegroom covers the bride's face with a veil. The bride wears this veil until the conclusion of the chuppah ceremony.


The following story is attributed to Rabbi Yaakov Eizik Blatner of Tatrask, written by Rabbi Rafael Nachman Kahn, translated from the Hebrew by Basha Majerczyk

The Mitteler Rebbe's daughter was betrothed to the son of Reb Mordechai of Chernobyl.  During the wedding, when Reb Mordechai asked the Rebbe to present a Torah insight, the Rebbe declined, suggesting that Reb Mordechai himself say something.  This is what he said:

We find that our Matriarch Rivka covered herself with a veil when she first met her groom, the Patriarch Yaakov.  Rashi translates the verse as "vatiskos [she veiled herself] in the reflexive form, as in vatiskover [she was buried] and vatishover."

Now, there are three stages in life - birth, marriage and death. These times always cause a tumult; joyful merriment when one is born and marries, mournful bereavement when one passes away.  During birth and death, the one responsible for all the attention is indifferent to the commotion he is causing.  It is only in marriage when one appreciates the tumult being generated, and it is probable that this will bring him to arrogance and make him haughty.

"Rivka, however, was different. Even during her marriage she veiled herself, exemplifying humility and modesty. She was indifferent to all the commotion - as if she were being born or buried."

Learn more about the Badeken veiling ceremony at: The Veiling Ceremony and Wedding Rituals and Customs

Question of the Week:

I recently attended a Chassidic wedding. It was a very different experience. One thing I had never seen before is that the bride wears a veil at the Chuppah that is so thick she can't see anything at all, and no one can see her face at all. What is the reason behind this?

Answer:

There's an old stereotype when it comes to marriage. Men marry women for their looks. Women marry men for their money. As cynical as this view may be, there is some truth to it.

Men fall for beauty. The fact that there are plenty of pretty girls with rotten character does nothing to stop the male quest for a beauty queen. And so, many wonderful girls are overlooked simply because they do not fit into today's narrow and superficial definition of beauty.

Meanwhile, women say they want a man who is financially stable, which is often just a euphemism for a rich guy. Somehow she thinks that if he has a seven digit bank balance he will know how to look after her. As if buying expensive jewellery and luxurious holidays is the only way to show her he really cares. And the really nice guys who are not such high flyers are often left behind.

Of course we need to be attracted to our spouse. And of course we all need money to survive. But these are not the most essential ingredients for a happy marriage. Too often people fall for the outer version of what they truly seek. Rather than physical beauty, what we are really looking for is inner beauty and a sweet heart. It is not wealth we seek, what we really want is a steadfast and dependable source of moral support. Looks and money are poor substitutes for good character and emotional supportiveness. It is only when we see beyond these external features and meet a real person that we have a chance of finding and keeping our soulmate.

This is the message behind the thick veil. When the groom veils his bride, he is telling her, "I am not marrying you for your pretty face. I am marring you for the beautiful person you are. So I can marry you with your face covered. Your beauty shines from within." And the bride being veiled is telling him, "This veil will prevent me from seeing what type of wedding ring you place on my finger. I don't care. I will accept whatever ring you give, because along with it I get you. It is you I want to marry, not your money or the jewellery you buy me."

A rich guy can lose his money, a pretty girl her looks. But inner beauty and spiritual wealth are ours forever. A marriage based on such eternal values will conquer just about anything. The bride's face may be veiled, but her vision is clearer than ever.

Rabbi Aron Moss - Nefesh

The Motives of a Critic

Art: Norman Rockwell

Source: Based on Likutei Sichos, Lubavitcher Rebbe

Parshas Pinchas

The tribes appeared to have convincing proof that Pinchas' motives were not pure [Rashi] but they were mistaken. This teaches us a powerful lesson whenever we are tempted to find fault with another person's good deeds and question their motives.  One can never know another's true intentions.  So long as a person is doing good, he should not be put down or mocked, even if one has a "solid" proof that the person is insincere. And in any case, even if it were true, and the person indeed had ulterior motives, we are taught always to study Torah and perform mitzvos even for the wrong reasons, since in this way one will eventually come to have pure motives.

A deeper question here is: Where does the desire come from to find fault in people who are doing something good?  In our case, the tribes appeared to have holy intentions: they were concerned that Pinchas had slighted the honor of Moshe by taking the law into his own hands.  Similarly, a person may imagine that he has a low tolerance for other people's bad intentions because he himself is humble, and thus he finds the pride of others distasteful.

In truth, however, the reverse is likely the case.  The fact that a person criticizes the good deeds of another is probably because the critic himself is proud and does not like the idea that somebody else accomplished something that he did not.  Of course, he will not admit this, even to himself, because his pride makes him lazy, and recognizing that somebody else has accomplished something makes it more uncomfortable to remain lazy.  Therefore, his arrogance leads him to put down the other person's good deeds, so they do not wound his pride or inspire him to be a better person, which would require effort.

Furthermore, even if somebody's mitzvah observance does have overtones of haughtiness, the critic's pride is nevertheless more distasteful.  For, ultimately, the person who "showed off" with his mitzvah was at least honest about his pride, and did not attempt to conceal it.  The critic, however, cannot tolerate the truth that he too is proud, and he thus stoops to dishonesty, veiling his pride in a "cloak" of humility and righteous indignation.

The lesson is obvious: It is much wiser to be an activist than a critic.  For a little pride can make criticism destructive, rather than constructive, but a good deed always remains good, regardless of the intention.